Monday, March 31, 2014

FCC Puts the Kibosh on New JSA Deals

FLASH!!!!
TVNewsCheck
UPDATED, 3 P.M. ET

 FCCPutsOnNewJSA

The new rule bans new joint sales agreements in which one station sells 15% or more of the advertising time of another separately owned station in the same market. In addition, most existing JSAs will expire within two years unless the commission grants an exemption.

 
As anticipated, the FCC today ruled by a 3-2 vote that TV broadcasters generally may not form new joint sales agreements in which one station sells 15% or more of the advertising time of another separately owned station in the same market.
Some broadcasters have been using JSAs exceeding 15%, usually in concert with shared services agreements, to operate second TV stations in markets where outright ownership is prohibited by agency rules.
 
Also under the new regulation, existing JSAs would generally be required to unwind within two years, unless the broadcasters involved can persuade the FCC that a particular arrangement genuinely serves the public interest.
The commission said the Media Bureau will consider waiver requests within 90 days of the closing of the record on the requests.

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said that the FCC has long imposed ownership limits to promote competition, diversity and localism. "Today, what we are doing is closing off what has been a growing end-run around" the limits.
In a related move, the FCC asked for comments on whether broadcasters should be required to fully disclose details about other forms of shared services agreements and whether additional regulations should be imposed on SSAs.
 
The FCC's preexisting ownership rules prohibit TV stations in small and medium markets from owning more than one station. In large, they may own two as long as one of the stations in not among the market's top four rated. In most cases, that means not one of the Big Four network affiliates.
Under the FCC’s new JSA regs, the Media Bureau “should be able to move quickly” on waiver requests for station sharing deals where there’s no “change of effective ownership,” Bill Lake, Media Bureau chief, said at the FCC meeting.

The bureau may also be able to move relatively quickly on waiver requests where there has been an “effective acquisition” but no “acquisition-related financial entanglement” between the sharing stations “to compromise or impair the independence” of either station, Lake said.

But where effective control has passed from one station to another in the same market under a JSA deal, “one would imagine that the required showing of necessity and positive impact on the public interest [for a wavier request] would have to be very high to overcome the various forms of entanglement,” Lake said.
FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, who opposed the JSA crackdown and voted against the agency’s order, said the waiver standard was “vague and inchoate” and leaves “unbridled discretion” for the Media Bureau to grant or deny waiver requests.

“While I very much hope I am wrong, I fear that the substantial majority of requests will not meet with a favorable response,” Pai said.

NAB EVP of Communications Dennis Wharton responded to the commission’s action: "For a decade, Republican and Democratically-controlled FCCs have approved JSAs, which allow free and local TV stations to survive in a hyper-competitive world dominated by pay TV giants. That model is now declared illegal, based on the arguments of pay TV companies whose collaborative interconnect advertising sales practices make JSAs seem pale by comparison. It's disappointing the FCC would take this action without first completing its 2010 statutorily mandated media ownership review. As the record before the commission clearly shows, the public interest will not be served by this arbitrary and capricious decision."
Senate Commerce Chairman John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV said in a statement: “I thank the FCC for answering my call to rein in the misuse of broadcast television sharing agreements, which has threatened the integrity of the FCC’s media ownership rules. Today's action on joint sales agreements is a positive step forward, and I am pleased by the agency's further inquiry into how it can monitor the possible impact other sharing agreements could have on consumers.”
 
Free Press President Craig Aaron praised the FCC decision: "For years, a small handful of powerful conglomerates has used outsourcing agreements to dodge the FCC's ownership rules and grow their empires at the public's expense. And for too long the agency has looked the other way as these companies have dominated the airwaves. While today's vote focuses only on joint sales agreements, it signals that FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler is willing to break with the past and stop broadcasters from using shell companies to skirt the agency's ownership limits. We do have concerns about how the FCC will apply waiver standards. The agency must ensure that its efforts promote diverse ownership and do not prevent diverse owners from exercising real control over the stations licensed in their names. Bending the rules to keep sidecars in place would relegate these licenses to permanent second-class status. We need to ensure that this vote leads to real diversity on the public airwaves."
 
Martyn Griffen, government affairs associate at Public Knowledge, commented: "The commission's JSA order will make it harder for broadcast stations to circumvent media ownership rules in small and medium-sized markets. The FCC's actions are also a meaningful attempt to rein in programming costs. Instead of banding together with competitors to demand increased rates for their programming, local broadcasters should negotiate for carriage on pay TV systems on their own behalf. We applaud the FCC for closing this loophole in the media ownership rules."

Gen X Picks Up Where Boomers Left Off

 
MediaPost's
Engage Boomers
 
 
 
 
By Gordon Plutsky Monday, March 31, 2014

 



2014 is a big milestone in American demographic history: The last of the Boomers will turn 50. I’m proud to join Michelle Obama, Rob Lowe, Laura Linney, Sandra Bullock and Johnny Depp as we hit AARP eligibility. I’m not putting myself in the celebrity category, although most of us 1964’ers do share a youthful appearance and attitude. (Speaking of AARP, when the application came a few weeks ago, I laughed and tossed it into the recycling bin. I get the part about the discounts, but it feels like it’s for old people, and that’s just not us. We’re a group that still self-identifies as young.) 

There’s another milestone that’s getting less press, but will have similar implications for marketers and brands: In 2015, the first of Generation X starts turning 50 (with the youngest turning 35). Like the younger Boomers who came before them, they will also bring a youthful attitude to the silver birthday club. If it was not already clear to marketers, it’s time that content, campaigns and all other messages are tailored to younger Boomers … and older Gen X’ers.

Nearly 10 years ago, investors poured $32M into a site and portal called eons.com. It was supposed to be a place for people over 50 to come and connect and tap into various channels of content. Frankly, it sounded like a bad idea to me at the time, and unsurprisingly, it failed and no longer exists. It used age as the way to pull people in and make them feel like they belonged in a 50+ foot walled garden. They missed because people self-select content and community based on their passions, interests and desires. Age alone is not a community-organizing principal–no matter what demographic you’re targeting. You must identify and speak to their common interests. 

It’s time to create a marketing plan for a group of consumers 45-55 who share a common bond and history and are at the peak of their earning and spending power. They’re starting to flex their muscle as is evidenced by relatively older actresses (read: not 20 years old) appearing regularly in fashion and makeup commercials. And savvy marketers are eager to cater to them. For instance, OurTime, the new site for singles over 50, is picking up steam. And the site Better After 50 speaks to women (and some men) looking for their second act while showing them how to get the most out of this phase of life. It is not about slowing down, but rather speeding up and making the most out of every minute.

Here are some industries that need to respond:
Financial Services and Planning – This group is likely to live another 30-40 years, which has significant implications on retirement planning. We need to account for a possible second career and stretching the money a long way. Messaging should be directed to this group that is different than those in their 60s. Planners need to have frank conversations about needing to fund a long retirement.

Sports and Fitness - Better sports science and medical advances have us competing harder and longer than ever. There are millions of masters athletes in the U.S. who are being ignored by the big sporting goods manufactures and retailers. From running and biking to Crossfit and team sports, Americans over 50 are still competing hard. I’m signed up for two Spartan races this year and hope to do them for many years to come.

Fashion and Apparel – Again, how about products and campaigns aimed this segment. There has to be a middle ground between youthful fashion, which makes us look silly, and clothes made for old men and women. I don’t want to look like Pauly or the Situation on the Jersey Shore, nor do I want to dress like I am heading to the clubhouse for cards at El Boca Del Vista.

Food and Beverage – In 15-20 years, we are likely to be the healthiest group of senior citizens ever. We have the benefit of a web’s worth of knowledge of all the advances in research and nutritional sciences. Many begin cutting back on meat and animal products as research has shown that a plant-based diet is extremely beneficial after 50. Companies who focus on organics, plant-protein and healthy living should target this group with information, recipes and social campaigns to engage and educate. They will find a willing audience.

Broadband Consumers Big On TV, Millennials Favor Internet Set-Top

broadbandtvMediaDailyNews

 

by , Mar 28, 2014, 11:12 AM

Internet set-top boxes -- those small plug-in USB stick-like devices for TV sets -- are big with some millennials. Older media consumers also favor the new consumer product.

The video content/media research firm The Diffusion Group says that media consumers 25-34 and 45-54 are the biggest users of those devices.

Overall, 14% of U.S. broadband homes currently use Internet set-top box devices, like Google’s Chromecast, Roku or Apple TV to access video content.

The reports says heavy marketing of these devices is targeted for those in their late 20s and early 30s -- but not as much for the younger 18-24 group, who tend to use other video content device access like that of game consoles. Diffusion says 29% of adult broadband users are likely to purchase a new Internet set-top box (iSTB) in the next six months. In addition, 48% of current iSTB users are likely to purchase another iSTB device.

Diffusion says at least 60% of U.S. broadband home have at least one TV connected to the Internet -- around 54 million TV homes.

In another recent Diffusion report, conducted with 1,671 users, adult broadband media consumers 55+ said they spent 61% of their daily TV time watching live broadcast/cable programming versus 4% watching from online video platforms.

In contrast, those 18-24 years of age now spend more of their daily TV time watching online video sources -- 33% -- than from traditional TV sources -- 29%.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

It's A Multi-Screened World


 

Thursday, March 27, 2014
 
 Research Brief: From the Center for Media Research
 
According to results from the AdReaction Report, Marketing in a Multi-screen World, from Millward Brown, a typical multiscreen user consumes 7 hours of screen media per day during a 5 hour period. In most countries, smartphones are now the primary screen, taking up 2.5 hours of time daily. Smartphones and laptops dominate daytime screen use while TV takes center stage in the evenings, when tablet use also peaks.
For US respondents:
· 45% of daily smartphone time is spent simultaneously with TV
· 37% of daily laptop time is spent with TV
· 55% of daily tablet time is spent simultaneously with TV
The study, 15-question survey administered via smartphone or tablet, to more than 12,000 multiscreen users, ages 16 to 44, across 30 countries. Multiscreen users were defined as people who own, or have access to, a TV and a smartphone and/or a tablet.
Some experts view multiscreen proactively and are trying to capitalize on the opportunity to amplify experiences between brands and consumers, says the report. Others view it more defensively and worry that multiscreen could potentially result in a “lack of attention” for traditional approaches Those in the middle are not yet sure if it presents opportunity or threat, but are investigating curiously and adjusting their approaches accordingly. All agreed that multiscreen behaviors are impacting how they approach their media mix.
· “There’s no funnel any more. It’s not linear, people like to bounce around. All of these screens are putting things in front of you that can trigger purchases instead of cueing up the purchase cycle. Brands have got to get out there or they won’t be noticed.”
· “Multiscreening is simply how people are living their lives. Integrated marketing campaigns across Mobile-Internet-TV will make a real difference in terms of how they touch people, generating a deeper impact and creating word-of-mouth effects.”
· “Don’t make it hard for consumers to ‘follow’ what you’re presenting. Make each part of the experience stand on its own. Each of the parts has to tell the whole story.”
· “People are so used to being broadcasted at with TV, the interaction experience doesn’t come naturally to them. Make it easy for them to take part.”
· “Shifted multiscreen behavior is the phenomenon that can most easily be used for daily media planning since it can be planned in advance.”
Source: Firefly Millward Brown; Qualitative interviews with industry experts
In summary, the detailed study found that just 35% of screen time is simultaneous use of TV and a digital device. Of this, just 14% is meshing (simultaneous use for related content), and 22% is stacking (simultaneous use for unrelated content). Therefore, says the report, the biggest multiscreen marketing opportunity is shifting (65% of screen time). Brands can take advantage of shifting by using synergistic multiscreen campaigns.
TV is generally more of a starting point and digital devices are generally used more to continue/complete tasks. Multiscreen sequences are most likely to start on TV and continue on a smartphone. However, all screen sequences are possible. Receptivity is higher for TV than for ads on digital screens, says the report, but brands cannot rely TV ads alone. Consumers expect brands to be present on multiple devices and are impressed by those who find entertaining and useful ways of delivering across screens.
For a typical global multiscreen user smartphones are now comfortably the largest single screen medium around the world. Combined with tablet minutes, mobile devices now take up 47% of all screen time. Asked, “Roughly how long did you spend yesterday…watching television (not online); Using the Internet on a laptop or PC; on a smartphone; on a tablet?” the results showed:
Daily Time Spent
Device
Time Spent
TV
113 minutes (27%)
Smartphone
147 minutes (35%)
Laptop
108 minutes (26%)
Tablet
50 minutes (12%)
Total minutes
417 minutes
Source: Millward Brown, March 2014
As of 2013 there is still a significant gap between time spent on mobile devices and global mobile media investment levels (ZenithOptimedia). It’s no surprise, says the report, that mobile spend is forecast to grow rapidly in the next few years, and faster than forecast.
Asked “Roughly how long did you spend yesterday…watching television (not online)/ Using the Internet on a laptop or PC/ on a smartphone/ on a tablet?” the study shows:
Daily Use of Media
 
TV
Laptop
Smartphone
Tablet
Daily screen minutes
113 27%
108 26%
147 35%
50 12%
Global media spend
   2013
66%
29%
4% combined
   2016
60%
29%
12% combined
Source: Millward Brown, March 2014
Overall screen minutes vary significantly by country, from 9 hours in Indonesia to just over 5 hours in Italy. US…444 Minutes, 7.4 hours. Smartphones are now the most viewed medium in all countries except UK, France and Spain (where TV leads), and Hungary, Poland, Russia, & Slovakia (where laptops lead).
Of the total time screens are being viewed, simultaneous use with TV is taking place around a third of the time. Of their 7 hours screen consumption, 109 minutes is simultaneous consumption of a digital screen while watching TV. Hence, a typical global multiscreen user spends just over 5 hours (308 minutes) with screens every day.
And, breaking down the simultaneous minutes into “meshing” (where TV and a digital screen are being used to consume related content), and “stacking” (where the content is unrelated), more time is spent stacking than meshing.
When asked: At the same time as you were watching TV yesterday, how much time did you also spend using the Internet? And, while you were watching TV and using the Internet yesterday, how much of the time were you doing something related to what was happening on TV?, the study found:
Multi-Screening
Time & Percent of Usage
Shifting (at different points in time)
(199”) 65%
Stacking (at the same time)(unrelated content)
(67”) 22%
Meshing (related content)
(42”) 14%
Total minutes:
417
Net minutes:
308
Source: Millward Brown, March 2014
Social media stacking is the multiscreen equivalent of putting the kettle on. TV is also often being viewed partially/ passively. There are less reasons for people to mesh; more information is the main one. These reasons are fairly universal, with limited variation by country or region, says the report.
Why Multi-Screen
Reason
% of Respondents
Any meshing reason
 41%
   Follow up on a TV ad
11%
   Interact with what's happening on TV
14%
   Discuss what I’m watching (e.g. via social media)
19%
   Find more information about what's on TV
24%
Any stacking reason
85%
   Need to get other things done
20%
   Someone else has chosen what's on TV
25%
   Just have TV on for background noise
27%
   TV is not interesting enough for all my attention
28%
   Keep up with friends on social media (not TV related)
39%
   Fill time during ad breaks
42%
Source: Millward Brown, March 2014
Due to highest overall viewing, smartphones are most likely to be used both simultaneously with TV, and stand alone. Laptops are proportionately most likely to be used exclusively. Tablets are proportionately most likely to be used alongside TV, says the report:
At the same time
· TV+Laptop 31”   (29%)
· TV+smartphone 54”   (37%)
· TV+Tablet 24”   (49%)
At different points in time
· Laptop 77”   (71%)
· Smartphone 93”   (63%)
· Tablet 25”   (51%)
The report concludes by suggesting that, in order to reach and engage a large number of multiscreen users, most global brands will need to deploy media plans with a far heavier mobile emphasis than they do at present. This is increasingly the primary way to access many groups of people. The main principles for success across screens are to be:
· Consistent – Whenever someone engages with you, whatever screen they’re using and wherever they are, your brand experience and messaging should be uniform
· Connected – Think about second-screen experiences, specifically how your marketing can interact engagingly between screens and travel seamlessly across screens
· Considered – Some screens are better than others at communicating particular aspects of your brand’s personality
· Concise – Use mobile-friendly, shareable content that entertains first, informs second