The ad dollars
spoken refers to national, regional.... not local-direct, the true controllable
revenue available for new business any day of the week. Philip Jay LeNoble,
PhD.
TVN’S MANAGING MEDIA BY MARY COLLINS
Broadcasters, The Wolf
Is at Your Door
Looking ahead to a downturn in 2023, TV stations
have more to fret about than a standard-variety recession. Most ad categories
are cutting spending; competition from all sides, including streaming, is
fiercer than ever; and TV’s lack of reliable measurement is tying a hand behind
its back.
By Mary M. Collins | September 21, 2022 | 5:30
a.m. ET.
We’ve
all seen the forecasts: Television ad sales for the second half of this year
should ensure record 2022 revenues. S&P Global Market Intelligence’s Radio & TV Annual Outlook puts 2022
TV station ad income at $24.15 billion. That’s almost 18% better than in 2021.
Naturally,
analysts expect 2023 to be down a bit. It’s an odd year with no political
advertising or Olympics to boost sales. But there’s more at work than just the
normal two-year cycle. We are already hearing about a possible slippage from
what was sold in the 2022-23 upfronts. Growth projections for later years seem
to be below the Federal Reserve’s 2% inflation target. Factors at work now mean
television needs to plan for a changed selling environment or resign itself to
becoming irrelevant.
Recession
is obviously the first concern. MoffetNathanson reportedly predicts that, when it comes, the
downturn will span five quarters. Recessions are a normal part of the economic
cycle. While we always seem surprised by them, media has survived them before
and can do so again. What’s of more concern are the changes that cannot be
managed by good fiscal stewardship alone.
Political Advertising — Friend or Foe?
Consider
political advertising. Forecasts show more dollars being spent in more
concentrated areas — some stations see a windfall, others get nothing. AdImpact estimates $9.7 billion in 2022
political advertising; this surpasses the $9 billion spent in 2020, which
included a presidential race. The 2022 estimate is more than double the $4
billion spent on the last mid-term elections in 2018. The accepted wisdom is
that more money is spent during presidential election years than for mid-term
elections. If that holds true, what does this trend mean for 2024 and 2026?
A
2012 article in The Broadcast Law Blog explains that TV
stations must provide “reasonable access” to ad time for all
candidates for federal office and at the lowest unit rate. Stations are not
obligated to sell time to candidates for state or local races, but if they sell
to one, they must sell to all candidates in that race (with some very limited
exceptions).
BRAND CONNECTIONS
Research
shows that television advertising is still the best way to educate voters about
a candidate or issue; social media’s strengths lay elsewhere.
With so much political advertising money being spent to influence local votes
in target areas, how long will it be before other advertisers are crowded out
and look elsewhere to transmit their messages?
Most Advertising Categories Are Cutting Spending
While
political advertising spending has been on the upswing, other traditional
categories have reduced their advertising investment. Standard Media Index’s “Core Release Note” for July 2022 shows that
month’s advertising expenditures were 12% lower than those in July 2021.
To
explain part of the change, the authors cite differing circumstances including
the absence of Olympics programming and the shift of the NBA Finals back to
June. Regardless, what caught my eye was that the majority of the ad categories
tracked by the group showed a year-over-year (YoY) decline in advertising
spending. Of the 12 “Product Group Categories” identified, only four grew:
Consumer Package Goods were up 1.0%; Travel increased 28%; and Apparel &
Accessories advertising rose by 4%.
Keep
in mind that, with the exception of Consumer Package Goods, which accounts for
22% of measured advertising spend, the other categories’ contributions are
significantly smaller. Retail comes in at 8% of the total, Travel (which saw
the largest YoY increase) accounts for 3% of the advertising dollars, and
Apparel & Accessories only contribute 2%.
Brain
Wieser, Group M’s global president of business intelligence, noted a similar
trend during his summer podcasts. In one he warned of slowed spending from what
he calls “Digital Endemic” advertisers. These are
digital companies, such as Amazon, which spend disproportionately more of their
total revenue on advertising.
Increased Competition
Television
is seeing new competition from all sides. First there’s the explosion in
options for watching video content. This means both a flood of content from
creators with all levels of experience and more bidders for the highest quality
content. Marquee live events, like sports, command premium prices because they
can all but guarantee the largest audiences.
This
is leading to a shift in distribution outlets — see NFL’s Thursday
Night Football move to Amazon Prime. It’s no longer even notable when
a series relocates from a television network to a streaming service — The
Mindy Project transferred from Fox to Hulu; Unbreakable Kimmy
Schmidt left NBC for Netflix; Futurama went from Fox
to Comedy Central to Hulu; and the list goes on.
At
the same time, other video businesses are positioning themselves as viable
alternatives for advertisers. Anyone who’s clicked on a YouTube link has seen
at least one commercial for Airbnb, VBRO or another national advertiser.
Netflix, which famously backtracked on its no-ads stance earlier this year, now
plans to have its ad-supported option available in November. Despite the
negative observations about planned pricing and the company’s ad sales
strategy, the bottom line is that clients are asking that Netflix be included
in their advertising mix.
It’s
not just OTT and streaming companies going after ad dollars. Amazon recognized
about $31 billion in 2021 ad sales revenue. Walmart reported $2.1 billion for ad
sales in the same year and has a deal to sell Paramount+ through its Walmart Connect offering. Even electric
vehicle charging stations are getting into the act. Since the largest charging
operators target retail locations for their devices, they can offer advertisers
the opportunity to reach consumers at the point of sale. One automotive-related
business mentioned using the tactic to tell
customers that his company offered products and service for all types of
vehicles; that’s a message that could be communicated in a TV spot.
Measurement Matters
All
of this is exacerbated by the measurement problem. Amazon knows a lot about the
consumers to whom they are serving ads. Walmart has “122 million unique users in the U.S.” along with
5,335 Walmart and Sam’s Club stores; there’s a lot of potential value to
advertisers if the company can offer them combined ecommerce and in-store
purchase information.
Netflix
says it won’t be providing viewership data to advertisers, but it’s early days.
Even the charging stations can provide targeting and behavioral data. TV is
still, primarily, relying upon Nielsen, a system which lost its accreditation,
has just delayed the use of its big data solution for “transaction purposes” and expects its recent acquisition by an investment group
to close in October.
The Wolf Is At The Door
The
outlook for 2023 and beyond is bleak if companies don’t figure out how to
address these issues. The only television group that seems to be taking the
threats seriously is NBCUniversal. It has already announced a new measurement
currency and new ad formats, all intended to give
advertisers what they want most — a way to engage potential customers. The
jury’s still out on which, if any, will prove successful, but at least it is
innovating.
Yes,
new technologies and offerings cost money. The alternative is relying on the
whims of political campaigns, selling to advertisers looking for a bargain
without good measurement, and spending eye-popping sums on live sports
programming.
When
making plans for 2023, you need to know that the wolf is at the door.
Former president and CEO of the Media Financial Management
Association and its BCCA subsidiary, Mary M. Collins is a change agent,
entrepreneur and senior management executive. She can be reached at MaryMCollins1@comcast.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment