Two Fundamental Causes of
Senior Management Giving Up on Sales
Article | Mon, 07/11/2016 -
05:26
by: Frank Visgatis,
President/COO of CustomerCentric Selling®
A disturbing trend that I am
seeing in the marketplace is an escalating level of apathy at the senior
executive level as it relates to the effectiveness and value of their sales
organizations. In other words, more and more executives seem to be throwing in
the towel when it comes to salespeople actually being able to move the revenue
needle. As I dig deeper, I see two fundamental causes for this:
1. They have tried and
failed one too many times when it comes to training their
salespeople. After repeatedly turning to various sales methodologies and
sales trainings looking for the magic bullet, and despite investing significant
amounts of money, nothing has changed from a revenue or performance
perspective. Time and time again, I see companies latch on to the newest,
sexiest training du jour (can you say “Challenger Selling?”) in the hopes that
this will finally be the one.
However, they repeatedly
make the mistake of viewing the training as the end of the process when, in
reality, it is just the beginning. Measurable sales results, no matter what
methodology you subscribe to, are directly correlated to the commitment of
first-line sales management to actually implementing what the salespeople have
been trained on. Too often, with no commitment to the heavy lifting of real
business process change, once they go nine to 12 months with no measurable
results, they decide it must not have been the right training, when the reality
is that they were never really committed to it in the first place.
2. They have bought too far
into how much of an impact the Internet has had on the sales process. There are
multiple, different studies that have documented what we all know: the Internet
has changed the game for vendors. With so much information available online to
potential buyers, vendors have decided that the best they can do is manage, and
worse, encourage inbound inquiries. What they fail to recognize is that no
matter how compelling your marketing messaging may be, the best that will
likely get you is a seat at the table. In fact, I see so many sales
organizations that have pivoted back to leading with a demo. That was a flawed
approach 30 years ago and it is a flawed approach today. From a fundamental
buyer perspective, when a vendor leads with a demo, having never taken the time
to understand the buyer’s needs, all they are doing is throwing garbage against
the wall and hoping something sticks. Additionally, without proactive
salesperson interaction (i.e. understanding the unique needs of any given
buyer), they fail to build any unique business value, and even when selected,
are relegated to negotiating solely on price.
Salespeople, ultimately, are
the only ones who truly can help a company move the revenue needle. The
question is, are companies and their senior executives willing to acknowledge
that there are no quick fixes? Or are they just waiting for the next
“groundbreaking” research and approach to finally provide the pixie dust?
As companies race to develop
new technology, better products, and the latest, greatest features, the ones
that will succeed are those that recognize it’s not about them – it’s about the
customer. The days of relying on your product for competitive differentiation
are over. Even if you come out with some groundbreaking feature, you have to realize
your competitors have access to all of the same information on the Internet
that your prospects have. They will figure out how to either replicate the
functionality or how to sell around it in very short order. The path to success
in 2016 and beyond is creating a superior buying experience for your
prospects by focusing on helping them achieve their goals, solve their
problems, and satisfy their needs. How you sell is the true competitive
differentiator. Whether or not senior management will get behind this concept
is up to them.
No comments:
Post a Comment