With all the headlines around new measurement and currencies in the news for national TV advertisers, we might think new cross-platform metrics are just around the corner -- especially for the upfront advertising market starting this summer.
Tone down your expectations.
We should think more about “secondary guarantees” -- which would not replace primary Nielsen viewing guarantees, but where some brands would make new deals that also would include older legacy TV viewers' promises.
To be fair, these might be limited in nature -- according to the specifics of the brand, over a tight time period, and around a narrower targeted measure for, say, a select group of shows.
Yes, there are tons of qualifiers in that last sentence. Well, it’s a start -- or should I say a continuation of efforts that began in recent years.
Last year, for example, A+E Networks talked up “secondary guarantees” for marketers.
It did this by shifting away from typical demographics metrics-attached deals to total audience guarantees as its primary mode of transaction, where demographic viewing groups -- 18-49 viewers and 25-54 viewers, for example -- were offered as secondary guarantees.
This followed a more adventurous move by A+E in May 2018, in which the network group became what was believed to be the first to make business-outcome guarantees for a select group of advertisers targeting specific criteria.
New secondary guarantees would go further -- and that might lead some to ask: What's the incentive for TV networks to give themselves more work -- and possibly make it more difficult for to monetize their ad inventory?
Well, there are lots of incentives -- including the promise of more healthy linear, TV-based cross-platform advertising for the future -- linear TV, connected TV, or whatever.
TV networks are doing their part, pulling in all sorts of new measurement from a number of non-Nielsen companies. Some -- like Disney Advertising, NBCUniversal, Paramount Global and WarnerMedia -- are either doing a number of tests with media agency holding company groups -- or, in NBCUniversal's case, actually give “certified” status to measurement companies like iSpot.tv.
There is still a long way to go -- like requiring independent Media Rating Council accreditation, according to many executives. They don’t want -- as MediaPost Editor In Chief Joe Mandese has said many times -- to have media content companies "grading their own homework."
New secondary guarantees can be seen as a testing hedge for certain brands to see whether any of these new measurements offers results with stronger, more predictable attribution data and successful business outcomes.
Working on these "secondary guarantees" will enable marketers to get in on the ground floor. But the key here comes down to the word "working."